Evolution of chromium and cobalt serum levels after the use of a modular neck stem in primary total hip arthroplasty. / Evolución de los niveles séricos de cromo y cobalto tras el empleo de un vástago con cuello modular en la artroplastia total de cadera primaria.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Modular neck primary stems were introduced with the theoretical advantage of restoring the hip anatomy more precisely. However, the presence of a second junction has been associated with increased corrosion and release of metal debris. The objective of our study is to quantify of chromium and cobalt serum values, and to analyze their temporal evolution during five years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a prospective series of 61 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty by implantation of the HMAX-M® stem (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italy). Serum chromium and cobalt determinations were performed at six months, two years and five years. RESULTS: Our series shows a progressive elevation in chromium levels with a significant difference between chromium values at six months (0.35±0.18) and five years (0.52±0.36), P=.01. Regarding cobalt, a statistically significant elevation is observed between six months and two years and a subsequent stabilization of values between two and five years, with a cobalt mean at six months (1.17±0.8) significantly lower than at two (2.63±1.76) and five years (2.84±2.1), P=.001. CONCLUSION: Elevated serum cobalt levels have been observed in patients who underwent modular neck stem implantation. The results obtained in this study have limited the use of stems with a modular neck in our clinical practice.

[Translated article] Evolution of chromium and cobalt serum levels after the use of a modular neck stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Modular neck primary stems were introduced with the theoretical advantage of restoring the hip anatomy more precisely. However, the presence of a second junction has been associated with increased corrosion and release of metal debris. The objective of our study is to quantify of chromium and cobalt serum values, and to analyse their temporal evolution during five years. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a prospective series of 61 patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty by implantation of the H MAX-M® stem (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italy). Serum chromium and cobalt determinations were performed at six months, two years and five years. RESULTS: Our series shows a progressive elevation in chromium levels with a significant difference between chromium values at six months (0.35±0.18) and five years (0.52±0.36), p=.01. Regarding cobalt, a statistically significant elevation is observed between six months and two years and a subsequent stabilisation of values between two and five years, with a cobalt mean at six months (1.17±0.8) significantly lower than at two (2.63±1.76) and five years (2.84±2.1), p=.001. CONCLUSION: Elevated serum cobalt levels have been observed in patients who underwent modular neck stem implantation. The results obtained in this study have limited the use of stems with a modular neck in our clinical practice.

Comparison of chromium and cobalt serum levels between a modular neck stem and its monoblock counterpart in primary total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The addition of junctions in modular stems implies a greater susceptibility to corrosion. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare serum chromium and cobalt levels after using a bimodular stem and its monoblock counterpart in primary total hip arthroplasty. Postoperative clinical scores were also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study between 2012 and 2015 was designed. One arm of the cohort included patients with the cementless modular neck stem H-Max M® and the other with the cementless monoblock stem counterpart H-Max S®. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in chromium value between groups (p = 0.621) at two years postoperative. Cobalt value was higher in the modular group (p = < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in clinical postoperative scores except for the Harris Hip Score, with better results at six months in modular group (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Higher serum cobalt level in the modular group has limited the use of modular stems in our daily practice. Advantages of modular stem were not found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

[Translated article] Comparison of leg length discrepancy correction after the use of a modular neck stem and its monoblock homologue in total primary hip arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Dual modularity stems seek to more precisely restore anatomy by allowing intraoperative adjustments thanks to modular necks. Our aim is to compare the radiographic length correction with the H MAX-M® Stem versus its monoblock counterpart H MAX-S®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out through consecutive sampling on patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with coxarthrosis diagnosis between 2011 and 2015. One arm of the cohort included patients who were operated with a modular stem and the other with a monobloc stem. Length was measured on the anteroposterior pelvic-bearing radiograph at 6 months. The mean of the measurements obtained for each arm of the cohort were compared with each other. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the correction of asymmetry between both groups, determined as the difference in length between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (p=.106). Nor were differences observed in postoperative length values (p=.053). It should be noted that for both the modular stem and the monobloc stem, the majority group is the one with restored length (84.1% and 80.4%, respectively; p=.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the theoretical advantage of modularity and that having interchangeable parts could be of great interest, in our study, we have not been able to demonstrate a superiority of modular designs compared to monoblock for control of postoperative leg length discrepancy.

Comparison of leg length discrepancy correction after the use of a modular neck stem and its monoblock homologue in total primary hip arthroplasty. / Comparación de la corrección de la discrepancia de longitud de miembros tras el empleo de un vástago con cuello modular y su homólogo monobloque en la artroplastia total de cadera primaria.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Dual modularity stems seek to more precisely restore anatomy by allowing intraoperative adjustments thanks to modular necks. Our aim is to compare the radiographic length correction with the H MAX-M® Stem versus its monoblock counterpart H MAX-S®. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out through consecutive sampling on patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with coxarthrosis diagnosis between 2011 and 2015. One arm of the cohort included patients who were operated with a modular stem and the other with a monobloc stem. Length was measured on the anteroposterior pelvic-bearing radiograph at six months. The mean of the measurements obtained for each arm of the cohort were compared with each other. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the correction of asymmetry between both groups, determined as the difference in length between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.106). Nor were differences observed in postoperative length values (P=.053). It should be noted that for both the modular stem and the monobloc stem, the majority group is the one with restored length (84.1% and 80.4%, respectively; P=.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the theoretical advantage of modularity and that having interchangeable parts could be of great interest, in our study, we have not been able to demonstrate a superiority of modular designs compared to monoblock for control of postoperative leg length discrepancy.

Comparison of the correction of the femoral offset after the use of a stem with modular neck and its monoblock homologue in total primary hip arthroplasty. / Comparación de la corrección del offset femoral tras el empleo de un vástago monobloque y un vástago con cuello modular en la artroplastia total de cadera primaria.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Dual modularity stems were introduced with the theoretical advantage of restoring hip anatomy more precisely through femoral offset and limb length adjustment. Interchangeable necks allow for intraoperative angulation, anteversion and length changes. Our objective is to study whether a better femoral offset correction is achieved with the H MAX-M® prosthesis (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italy) compared to its monoblock counterpart. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted by means of consecutive sampling on adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis between January 2011 and December 2015. This cohort has two arms, one arm included patients who underwent modular neck arthroplasty and the other included patients who underwent monoblock total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic offset measurement of the operated hip and the contralateral hip was performed, and the difference between both values was calculated. The mean of the measurements obtained for each arm of the cohort were compared with each other. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the difference in offset between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.323). No statistically significant differences were observed in the correction of the femoral offset, determined as the difference between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.323). Nor were differences observed in the postoperative offset values (P=.097). It should be noted that for both designs, the majority group is the one with restored offset (P=.001).

Comparación de la corrección del offset femoral tras el empleo de un vástago monobloque y un vástago con cuello modular en la artroplastia total de cadera primaria / Comparison of the correction of the femoral offset after the use of a stem with modular neck and its monoblock homologue in total primary hip arthroplasty

Introducción y objetivos: Los vástagos con doble modularidad fueron introducidos con la ventaja teórica de restaurar de forma más precisa la anatomía de la cadera a través del ajuste del offset femoral y la longitud de miembros. Los cuellos intercambiables permiten cambios intraoperatorios de angulación, anteversión y longitud. Nuestro objetivo es estudiar si se consigue una mejor corrección del offset femoral con la prótesis H MAX-M® (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italia) frente a su homólogo monobloque. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo mediante muestreo consecutivo sobre pacientes intervenidos de artroplastia total de cadera con el diagnóstico de coxartrosis desde enero de 2011 hasta diciembre 2015. Esta cohorte posee 2 brazos, un brazo incluyó a los pacientes intervenidos mediante vástago con cuello modular y el otro a los pacientes intervenidos mediante vástago monobloque. Se realizó la medición radiográfica del offset de la cadera intervenida, la cadera contralateral y se calculó la diferencia entre ambos valores. Las medias de las mediciones obtenidas para cada brazo de la cohorte se compararon entre sí. Resultados: No se han observado diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la corrección del offset femoral entre el grupo modular y monobloque, determinado como la diferencia de offset entre la cadera operada y la cadera contralateral (p=0,323). Tampoco se observaron diferencias en los valores de offset postoperatorio (p=0,097). Cabe decir que tanto para la prótesis modular como para la prótesis monobloque el grupo mayoritario es aquel con offset restaurado (p=0,001).(AU)

Introduction and objective: Dual modularity stems were introduced with the theoretical advantage of restoring hip anatomy more precisely through femoral offset and limb length adjustment. Interchangeable necks allow for intraoperative angulation, anteversion and length changes. Our objective is to study whether a better femoral offset correction is achieved with the H MAX-M® prosthesis (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italy) compared to its monoblock counterpart. Material and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted by means of consecutive sampling on adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis between January 2011 and December 2015. This cohort has two arms, one arm included patients who underwent modular neck arthroplasty and the other included patients who underwent monoblock total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic offset measurement of the operated hip and the contralateral hip was performed, and the difference between both values was calculated. The mean of the measurements obtained for each arm of the cohort were compared with each other. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the difference in offset between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.323). No statistically significant differences were observed in the correction of the femoral offset, determined as the difference between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.323). Nor were differences observed in the postoperative offset values (P=.097). It should be noted that for both designs, the majority group is the one with restored offset (P=.001).(AU)

Comparison of the correction of the femoral offset after the use of a stem with modular neck and its monoblock homologue in total primary hip arthroplasty / Comparación de la corrección del offset femoral tras el empleo de un vástago monobloque y un vástago con cuello modular en la artroplastia total de cadera primaria

Introduction and objective: Dual modularity stems were introduced with the theoretical advantage of restoring hip anatomy more precisely through femoral offset and limb length adjustment. Interchangeable necks allow for intraoperative angulation, anteversion and length changes. Our objective is to study whether a better femoral offset correction is achieved with the H MAX-M® prosthesis (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italy) compared to its monoblock counterpart. Material and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted by means of consecutive sampling on adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with the diagnosis of coxarthrosis between January 2011 and December 2015. This cohort has two arms, one arm included patients who underwent modular neck arthroplasty and the other included patients who underwent monoblock total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic offset measurement of the operated hip and the contralateral hip was performed, and the difference between both values was calculated. The mean of the measurements obtained for each arm of the cohort were compared with each other. Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the difference in offset between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.323). No statistically significant differences were observed in the correction of the femoral offset, determined as the difference between the operated hip and the contralateral hip (P=.323). Nor were differences observed in the postoperative offset values (P=.097). It should be noted that for both designs, the majority group is the one with restored offset (P=.001).(AU)

Introducción y objetivos: Los vástagos con doble modularidad fueron introducidos con la ventaja teórica de restaurar de forma más precisa la anatomía de la cadera a través del ajuste del offset femoral y la longitud de miembros. Los cuellos intercambiables permiten cambios intraoperatorios de angulación, anteversión y longitud. Nuestro objetivo es estudiar si se consigue una mejor corrección del offset femoral con la prótesis H MAX-M® (Limacorporate, San Daniele, Italia) frente a su homólogo monobloque. Material y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivo mediante muestreo consecutivo sobre pacientes intervenidos de artroplastia total de cadera con el diagnóstico de coxartrosis desde enero de 2011 hasta diciembre 2015. Esta cohorte posee 2 brazos, un brazo incluyó a los pacientes intervenidos mediante vástago con cuello modular y el otro a los pacientes intervenidos mediante vástago monobloque. Se realizó la medición radiográfica del offset de la cadera intervenida, la cadera contralateral y se calculó la diferencia entre ambos valores. Las medias de las mediciones obtenidas para cada brazo de la cohorte se compararon entre sí. Resultados: No se han observado diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la corrección del offset femoral entre el grupo modular y monobloque, determinado como la diferencia de offset entre la cadera operada y la cadera contralateral (p=0,323). Tampoco se observaron diferencias en los valores de offset postoperatorio (p=0,097). Cabe decir que tanto para la prótesis modular como para la prótesis monobloque el grupo mayoritario es aquel con offset restaurado (p=0,001).(AU)

Which route of administration of acid tranexamic, intravenous or intra-articular, is more effective in the control of post-surgical bleeding after a total hip arthroplasty? A prospective, controlled and randomized study. / Aplicación del tranexámico intravenoso o intraarticular en el control del sangrado posquirúrgico tras una artroplastia total de cadera. Estudio prospectivo, controlado y aleatorizado.

INTRODUCTION: One of the most frequent complications after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is bleeding, intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) is used to reduce it. We considered it necessary to carry out a study to clarify which administration route is superior. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Prospective, controlled and randomized study in 2 arms carried out between February 2017 and February 2018. 15mg/kg of intravenous TXA were administered in group-A and 2gr of intra-articular TXA in group-B. The values of haemoglobin and haematocrit were evaluated at 24h-72h, blood loss volume, drained blood volume, transfusions and complications. RESULTS: 78 patients were included, 31 with intravenous treatment and 47 with intra-articular. The decrease of haemoglobin in the intravenous group was 3.15±1.64g/dl in 24h and 3.75±1.56g/dl in 72h, the haematocrit decreased by 10.4±4.17% in 24h and 11.85±4.15% in 72h. In the intra-articular group there was a haemoglobin fall of 3.03±1.30g/dl in 24h and 3.22±1.2g/dl in 72h and the haematocrit fell by 10.66±3.6% and 12,11±3.29% in 24 and 72h (P>.05). The mean drainage in 24h was 195.80ml in group-A versus 253.93ml in group-B (P>.05) and in 48h it was 225.33ml in group-A and 328.19ml in group-B (P=.009). The intravenous group lost an average of 1,505ml of blood compared to the 11,280ml of the intra-articular group. In 5.1% of the cases, transfusions were necessary. We had no secondary complications. CONCLUSIONS: The different routes of administration of TXA in THA have a similar effect in the reduction of postoperative bleeding. There was no evidence of an increase in complications.

Primary total hip arthroplasty with fourth-generation ceramic bearings: Clinical and survival results with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. / Prótesis total de cadera primaria con par de fricción cerámica sobre cerámica de cuarta generación: resultados clínicos y de supervivencia con un seguimiento mínimo de 5 años.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical results and survival of primary hip prosthesis with ceramic delta bearings (C-C) with a minimum follow-up of 5years. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 205 primary hip arthroplasties performed between 2008 and 2012 were studied. The clinical results, pre-surgical and at 5years of follow-up were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). The position of the prosthetic components, periprosthetic osteolysis, loosening of the prosthetic components and ruptures of the ceramic components were studied radiologically. The adverse events related to bearings were recorded according to their diameter, paying special attention to prosthetic dislocations and the presence of noise. Survival with an endpoint of prosthetic revision for any cause was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Significant improvements were obtained in the HHS (88.7% of good/excellent results), SF36, WOMAC and EVA, P<.001. There were 19 adverse events related to the prosthesis (4 periprosthetic fractures, 4 dislocations, 2 superficial infections, 1 mobilization of the cup, 2 noises, 4 aseptic loosenings and 2 breaks of the prosthetic neck); 47.3% needed revision. The cumulative survival of the prostheses was 97.5% (95%CI: 96.4-98.5). No differences were found in survival, prosthetic adverse events, noise incidence or dislocations and clinical results among the different diameters used. CONCLUSIONS: Primary hip prostheses with fourth-generation ceramic bearings showed good survival in the medium term, and good clinical results.

Cobalt toxicity after revision total hip replacement due to fracture of a ceramic head. / Toxicidad por cobalto después de la revisión a una artroplastia total de cadera posterior a fractura de cabeza cerámica.

Symptomatic cobalt toxicity from a failed total hip replacement is a rare, but devastating complication. Potential clinical findings include cardiomyopathy, hypothyroidism, skin rash, visual and hearing impairment, polycythaemia, weakness, fatigue, cognitive impairment, and neuropathy. The case is presented of a 74year-old man in whom, after a ceramic-ceramic replacement and two episodes of prosthetic dislocation, it was decided to replace it with a polyethylene-metal total hip arthroplasty (THA). At 6months after the revision he developed symptoms of cobalt toxicity, confirmed by analytical determination (serum cobalt level=651.2µg/L). After removal of the prosthesis, the levels of chromium and cobalt in blood and urine returned to normal, with the patient currently being asymptomatic. It is recommended to use a new ceramic on ceramic bearing at revision, in order to minimise the risk of wear-related cobalt toxicity following breakage of ceramic components.